@article{AdamsNelsonTodd1992,
 author = "Dennis A. Adams and R. Ryan Nelson and Peter A. Todd",
 title = "Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication",
 journal = "MIS Quarterly",
 volume = {16},
 number = {2},
 year = {1992},
 issn = {0276-7783},
 pages = {227--247},
 doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249577},
 publisher = {Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center},
 address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
 }

@article{Ajzen1991,
 title = "The Theory of Planned Behavior",
 author = "Ajzen, Icek ",
 journal = " Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes ",
 pages = "179--211",
 number = "2",
 volume = "50",
 year = "1991",
 abstract = " Presents research dealing with various aspects of the
 theory of planned behavior. Prediction of intentions to perform
 different kinds of behavior; Relationship of perceived behavioral
 control to sets of salient behavioral, normative and control beliefs
 about the behavior; Means of dealing with measurement limitations;
 Inclusion of past behavior in the prediction equation. ",

 url = " http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5070987&site=ehost-live ",

}

@misc{Ajzen-tpb-www,
 title = "Theory of Planned Behavior",
 author = "Icek Ajzen",
 year = "bdw",
 url = "http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/tpb.html",
 note = "\url{http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/tpb.html}",
}


@incollection{Bandura1994,
  author = "Albert Bandura", 
  title = "Self-efficacy", 
  editor = "V. S. Ramachaudran",
  booktitle = "Encyclopedia of human behavior",
  volume = "4",
  year = 1994,
  pages = "71--81", 
  address ="New York",
  publisher = "Academic Press",
  note = "\url{http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html}"
}

 @Article{beebe,
  author = {Nelson H. F. Beebe},
  title = "Bibliography Prettyprinting and Syntax Checking",
  journal = "TUGBoat",
  issn = "1230-5650",
  year = "1995",
  volume = "14",
  no = "4",
  pages = "395--419",
  note = "\url{http://www.gust.org.pl/PDF/BIUL/10/l2html.pdf}"
}
 
@article{Burton-JonesHubona05,
 author = {Andrew Burton-Jones and Goeffrey S. Hubona},
 title = "Individual Differences and Usage Behaviour:  Revisiting a~Technology Acceptance Model Assumption",
 journal = "Data Base",
 volume = {36},
 number = "2",
 year = "2005",
 pages = "58--77",
}


@book{Cusumano2004,
 author = {Cusumano, Michael  A. },
 isbn = {074321580X},
 keywords = {business, software},
 month = {March},
 publisher = {Free Press},
 title = {The Business of Software: What Every Manager, Programmer, and Entrepreneur Must Know to Thrive and Survive in Good Times and Bad},
 url = {http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20\&amp;path=ASIN/074321580X},
 year = {2004}
}

@article{Davis1989,
 author = "Fred D. Davis",
 title = "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Easy of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology",
 journal = "MIS Quarterly",
 volume = {13},
 number = {3},
 year = {1989},
 pages = {319--340},
 tp:keywords = "TAM,#Prio",
 }

@article{DavisetAl1989,
 author = "Fred D. Davis and Richard P. Bagozzi and Paul R. Warshaw",
 title = "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models",
 journal = "Decision Sciences",
 volume = {35},
 number = {8},
 year = {1989},
 issn = {0025-1909},
 pages = {982--1003},
 publisher = {INFORMS},
 address = {Institute for Operations Research and  the Management Sciences (INFORMS), Linthicum, Maryland, USA},
 tp:keywords = "TAM",
 }


@book{FishbeinAjzen1975,
 title = "Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research",
 author = "M. Fishbein and Icek Ajzen",
 publisher = "Addison-Wesley",
 year = "1975",
}

@article{IgbariaetAl97,
 author = "Magid Igbaria and Nancy Zinatelli and Paul Cragg and Angele L.~M. Cavaye",
 title = "Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model",
 journal = "MIS Quarterly",
 volume = {21},
 number = {3},
 year = {1997},
 pages = {279--305},
 tp:keywords = "TAM,SEM,#Prio",
}

@article{LeeKozarLarsen2003,
 author = "Lee, Younghwa and Kozar, Kenneth A. and Larsen, Kai R. T.",
 title = "The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present And Future",
 journal = "Comm.~of the AIS", 
 volume = "12",
 year = "2003",
 pages = "752--780",
 keywords = "TAM; IT adoption; meta-analysis",
 tp:keywords = "TAM,IT_adoption,Metaanalysis,#Prio"
}

@article{MathiesonEtAl01,
 author = {Kieran Mathieson and Eileen Peacock and Wynne W. Chin},
 title = "Extending The Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence Of Perceived User Resources",
 journal = "SIGMIS Database",
 volume = {32},
 number = {3},
 year = {2001},
 issn = {0095-0033},
 pages = {86--112},
 doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/506724.506730},
 publisher = {ACM Press},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 tp:keywords = "TAM",
 }

@Book {MesserschmittSzyperski03,
 author = "David G. Messerschmitt and Clemens Szyperski",
 title = "Software Ecosystems: Understanding  an Indispensable Technology and Industry",
 publisher = {{MIT} Press},
 year = {2003},
 isbn = {0-262-13432-2}
}


@Article{TaylorTodd95,
 author = "Shirley Taylor and Peter A. Todd",
 title = "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A~Test Of Competing Models",
 journal = "Information Systems Research",
 volume = "6",
 number = "2", 
 year = "1995",
 pages = "144--176",
 tp:keywords = "Adoption,TTF",
}

@Article{TaylorTodd95MISQ,
 author = "Shirley Taylor and Peter A. Todd",
 title = "Assessing {IT} Usage: The Role of Prior Experience",
 journal = "MIS Quarterly",
 volume = "19",
 number = "4", 
 year = "1995",
 pages = "561--570",
 tp:keywords = "Adoption",
}

@book{Valimaki2005,
 author = "Mikko V{\"a}lim{\"a}ki", 
 title = "The Rise of Open Source Licensing. A Challenge to the Use  of Intellectual Property in the Software Industry",
 publisher = "Turre Publishing", 
 address = "Helsinki",
 year = "2005",
 note = "\url{pub.turre.com}",
 isbn = "952-91-8779-3"
}

@article{VenkateshDavis00,
 author = "Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D. Davis",
 title = "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model:  Four Longitudinal Field Studies",
 journal = "Management Science",
 volume = {46},
 number = {2},
 year = {2000},
 issn = {0025-1909},
 pages = "186--204",
 doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926},
 publisher = {INFORMS},
 address = {Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS), Linthicum, Maryland, USA},
 }

@article{venkateshdavismorris2007,
 author = "Venkatesh, Viswanath; Davis, Fred; and Morris, Michael G.",
 title =  "Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research",
 journal = "Journal of the AIS",
 year = "2007",
 volume = "8",
 number = "4", 
 url =  "http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol8/iss4/10",
 tp:keywords = "TAM",
}

@article{VenkateshEtAl03,
 author = "Viswanath Venkatesh and Michael G. Morris and Gordon B. Davis and and Fred D. Davis",
 title = "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View",
 journal = "MIS Quarterly",
 year = 2003,
 volume = "27",
 number = "3",
 pages = "425--478",
 abstract = " Information technology (IT) acceptance research has
 yielded many competing models, each with different sets of acceptance
 determinants.  In this paper, we (1) review user acceptance
 literature and discuss eight prominent models, (2) empirically
 compare the eight models and their extensions, (3) formulate a
 unified theory that integrates elements across the eight models, and
 (4) empirically validate the unified model.  The eight models
 reviewed are the theory of reasoned action, the technology acceptance
 model, a motivational model, the theory of planned behavior, a model
 combining the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned
 behavior, a model of PC utilization, innovation diffusion theory, and
 social cognitive theory.  Using data from four organizations over a
 six-month period with three points of measurement, the eight models
 explained between 17 percent and 53 percent of the variance in user
 intentions to use information technology.  Next, a unified theory,
 called the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
 (UTAUT), was formulated, with four core determinants of intention and
 usage, and up to four moderators of key relationships.  UTAUT was
 then tested using the original data and found to outperform the eight
 individual models (69\% adjusted-R2).  UTAUT was then confirmed with
 data from two new organizations with similar results (70\%
 adjusted-R2).  UTAUT thus provides a useful tool for managers needing
 to assess the likelihood of success for new technology introductions
 and helps them understand the drivers of acceptance in order to
 proactively design interventions (including training, marketing,
 etc.) targeted at populations of users that may be less inclined to
 adopt and use new systems.  The paper also makes several
 recommendations for future research including developing a deeper
 understanding of the dynamic influences studied here, refining
 measurement of the core constructs used in UTAUT, and understanding
 the organizational outcomes associated with new technology use.",
 tp:keywords = "TAM,UTAUT,#Prio",
 tp:comment = "Wartościowy przegląd różnych skal pomiarowych akceptacji IT . Model UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology)",
}

@book{p.perl,
  author = "Larry Wall and Tom Christiansen and Randall Schwartz",
  title = {Programming Perl},
  publisher = "O'Reilly \&~Associates",
  year          = {1996}
}

@article{ShumailaetAl2007b,
 author = "Shumaila Y. Yousafzai and Gordon R. Foxall and John G. Pallister",
 title = "Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the {TAM}: Part 2",
 journal = "Journal of Modelling in Management",
 year = 2007,
 volume = 2,
 issue = 3,
 page = "281--304",
 doi = "10.1108/17465660710834462",

 abstract = "Purpose -- This paper is the second of two concerned with
 a meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model (TAM). This part
 aims to present a rigorous and quantitative meta-analytic review of
 569 findings from 95 TAM studies as a basis for identifying gaps and
 providing guidelines for implementation management and conduct of
 future research. The paper also seeks to investigate the potential
 impact of methodological characteristics on the meta-analytic
 findings.  Design/methodology/approach -- The approach consists of
 meta-analysis following Hedges and Olkin's procedures,
 moderator-analysis using homogeneity Q-values, analogue to ANOVA and
 weighted regression method.  Findings -- The dominant focus in
 empirical investigations of the TAM has been on modelling intention
 for its effect on self-reported usage behaviour, while the
 attitudinal construct has been neglected. This raises three
 questions: whether the exclusion of attitude from the TAM is
 beneficial for understanding of technology usage behaviour in
 mandatory settings; whether the revised TAM holds equally for
 mandatory and voluntary settings; and whether the emphasis on
 measuring intentions and self-report use rather than actual usage is
 warranted. An additional question answered in the meta-analysis is
 about the relative importance of PU and PEOU.  Originality/value --
 The paper provides a rigorous meta-analysis to progress towards a
 unified view of the TAM. ",
 keywords = "Research, Technology led strategy, User studies",
}

@book{bartamarkiewicz05,
 title = "Oprogramowanie Open Source w Świetle Prawa. Między Własnością a Wolnością",
 author = "Janusz Barta and Ryszard Markiewicz",
 series = "Monografie Zakamycza",
 publisher = "Kantor Wydawniczy ZAKAMYCZE",
 address = "Kraków",
 year = "2005",
 isbn = "83-7444-092-9",
 tp:keywords = "OSS",
}

