Provides a small and fast bytecode manipulation framework.

The ASM framework is organized around the {@link clojure.asm.ClassVisitor ClassVisitor}, {@link clojure.asm.FieldVisitor FieldVisitor}, {@link clojure.asm.MethodVisitor MethodVisitor} and {@link clojure.asm.AnnotationVisitor AnnotationVisitor} abstract classes, which allow one to visit the fields, methods and annotations of a class, including the bytecode instructions of each method.

In addition to these main abstract classes, ASM provides a {@link clojure.asm.ClassReader ClassReader} class, that can parse an existing class and make a given visitor visit it. ASM also provides a {@link clojure.asm.ClassWriter ClassWriter} class, which is a visitor that generates Java class files.

In order to generate a class from scratch, only the {@link clojure.asm.ClassWriter ClassWriter} class is necessary. Indeed, in order to generate a class, one must just call its visitXxx methods with the appropriate arguments to generate the desired fields and methods. See the "helloworld" example in the ASM distribution for more details about class generation.

In order to modify existing classes, one must use a {@link clojure.asm.ClassReader ClassReader} class to analyze the original class, a class modifier, and a {@link clojure.asm.ClassWriter ClassWriter} to construct the modified class. The class modifier is just a {@link clojure.asm.ClassVisitor ClassVisitor} that delegates most of the work to another {@link clojure.asm.ClassVisitor ClassVisitor}, but that sometimes changes some parameter values, or call additional methods, in order to implement the desired modification process. In order to make it easier to implement such class modifiers, the {@link clojure.asm.ClassVisitor ClassVisitor} and {@link clojure.asm.MethodVisitor MethodVisitor} classes delegate by default all the method calls they receive to an optional visitor. See the "adapt" example in the ASM distribution for more details about class modification.

The size of the core ASM library, `asm.jar`, is only 45KB, which is much smaller than the size of the BCEL library (504KB), and than the size of the SERP library (150KB). ASM is also much faster than these tools. Indeed the overhead of a load time class transformation process is of the order of 60% with ASM, 700% or more with BCEL, and 1100% or more with SERP (see the `test/perf` directory in the ASM distribution)! @since ASM 1.3